Then he scurried away when I asked him about climate change during a press conference about flooding. How does someone rationalize holding a press conference about flooding along the Mississippi and NOT talk about climate change?
When people posted dozens of questions on his campaign page asking for his position on climate change his campaign ignored them and deleted every single question, no matter how politely worded. During a press conference on energy policy (held at a gas station outside the district) he still managed to avoid explaining whether he shares the anti-science, conspiratorial views of his former boss, John Shimkus.

Action Now has an online petition asking Davis to hold a town hall meeting in Springfield. It makes the modest request that Davis:
I won't hold my breath, but accepting their petition would show that Davis is willing to appear to groups other than the Republican party faithful.
- Run a clean, transparent campaign. As working parents who hold one, two and sometimes three jobs, we cannot easily attend events if we are given only 24 hours notice. We need adequate, advance notice before a meeting is held.
- Answer our questions. We deserve to know where Davis stands on issues that affect us, including the creation of good jobs, stopping cuts to vital services and ensuring the top 1% pay their fair share.
Davis isn't the first candidate to try getting elected by ducking controversial issues. Many consultants will advise that it's a smart strategy. Sometimes it works. Usually, a candidate isn't shy about where they stand if their views are in line with the district they're running in. What it suggests is that Davis holds extremist views similar to those of his former boss, John Shimkus, and he knows that isn't the kind of Congressman most voters in Illinois' 13th district are looking for.
Then again, he might just be auditioning for a part in the traveling production of Monty Phyton's Spamalot.